systematic prophylactic observation - Definition. Was ist systematic prophylactic observation
Diclib.com
Wörterbuch ChatGPT
Geben Sie ein Wort oder eine Phrase in einer beliebigen Sprache ein 👆
Sprache:

Übersetzung und Analyse von Wörtern durch künstliche Intelligenz ChatGPT

Auf dieser Seite erhalten Sie eine detaillierte Analyse eines Wortes oder einer Phrase mithilfe der besten heute verfügbaren Technologie der künstlichen Intelligenz:

  • wie das Wort verwendet wird
  • Häufigkeit der Nutzung
  • es wird häufiger in mündlicher oder schriftlicher Rede verwendet
  • Wortübersetzungsoptionen
  • Anwendungsbeispiele (mehrere Phrasen mit Übersetzung)
  • Etymologie

Was (wer) ist systematic prophylactic observation - definition

LEGAL RULE WHICH OVERPROTECTS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT
Prophylactic rules

Prophylactic surgery         
Draft:Prophylactic surgery; Prophylactic surgical procedures
Prophylactic surgery (also known as preventive surgery), is a form of surgery whose purpose is to minimize or prevent the risk of developing cancer in an organ or gland that has yet to develop cancer and is known to be at high risk of developing cancer. This form of preventive healthcare may include surgeries such as mastectomies, oophorectomies, colectomies and surgical corrections, such as the surgical correction of cryptorchidism or undescended testis.
Bonilla observation         
FIRST SIGHTING OF UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS
Jose Bonilla Observation; José Bonilla Observation
On August 12, 1883, the astronomer José Bonilla reported that he saw more than 300 dark, unidentified objects crossing before the Sun while observing sunspot activity at Zacatecas Observatory in Mexico. He was able to take several photographs, exposing wet plates at 1/100 second.
Society of Systematic Biologists         
ORGANIZATION
Society of systematic biologists
The Society of Systematic Biologists (SSB) started as the Society of Systematic Zoology in 1947. A temporary constitution was adopted at the first meeting on 28 December 1947.

Wikipedia

Prophylactic rule

A prophylactic rule is a judicially crafted rule that overprotects a constitutional right, and gives more protection than such right might abstractly seem to require on its face, in order to safeguard that constitutional right or improve detection of violations of that right.

In United States law, an example is the case of Miranda v. Arizona, which adopted a prophylactic rule ("Miranda warnings") to protect the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The exclusionary rule, which restricts admissibility of evidence in court, is also sometimes considered to be a prophylactic rule. The notion of prophylactic rules is controversial. U.S. Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas have argued against them, writing that the ability of judges to create these rules "is an immense and frightening antidemocratic power, and it does not exist."